27°
24°
16°
Partly Cloudy | Weather provided by KSTP.com
Metro

RNC protests turn violent; hundreds arrested

An anarchist protester smashes in the window of a department store in downtown St. Paul on Monday afternoon. The anarchist’s left a trail of destruction in their wake including a smashed police car.


BY Daily Staff
PUBLISHED: 09/02/2008

A mob of 200 anarchists marched through the streets of downtown St. Paul shouting, “Whose streets? Our streets.”

By the time they were through with their impromptu protest Monday afternoon, they were right.

A Minneapolis police car sat gutted after protesters smashed its windows as a horde of police finally caught up with them nearly two hours after the melee began.

Police were broadsided by the protest and opted to contain, rather than conclude, the unsanctioned demonstration-turned-riot.

Ramsey County Sheriff Bob Fletcher said police arrested around 100 protesters throughout Monday afternoon, and media outlets reported more than 283 people had been arrested, including 129 on felonies, as of press of time.

Deciding the route block-by-block based on which paths were least populated by police, the black-clad anarchist group stormed the streets of St. Paul with media members in tow, knocking over newspaper boxes and street-side garbage cans to block roadways.

Roadway blockers became the least of concerns when the group dug bricks out of landscaped areas and threw them at windows.

At one point, smoke bombs billowed and the smell and sting of pepper spray filled the air as protesters smashed windows in nearby buildings, including the First National Bank Building and Macy’s.

About a dozen police cars rolled up Sixth Street, and the anarchists ran to an intersection with a barricade to block advancing authorities. One jumped on the hood and roof of a squad car before rejoining the mob.

One squad car swerved to the side, and protesters smashed all its windows before scurrying into a full parking lot. They dodged cars and slinked through an alley without police pursuit, bringing the riot to an abrupt end.

After that, the more violent protest seemed to dissipate. Police beefed up security around the scheduled, peaceful parade following the earlier fracas; riot police lined streets and pushed security barriers back a half-block.

Protesters and police clash again

A group of protesters calling themselves the Anti-Capitalist Block clashed briefly with riot police before many were detained at Shepard Road under the St. Paul bluffs.

Police fired rubber bullets and tear gas at the group at the intersection at Jackson St reet and Shepard, after demonstrators sought entry onto the street.

The crowd then retreated in the other direction for about 15 minutes, followed closely by the advancing riot police firing smoke bombs and tear gas with some demonstrators banging on passing cars.

A volunteer medic calling himself Garth, an EMT from Oregon, said he treated “tens and tens” of injuries from tear gas and rubber bullets during the confrontation.

Demonstrator and University senior Jess Wenstrom said the violent police reaction was unprovoked.

“We were all walking on the sidewalk legally,” she said. “We were just yelling, ‘We’re peaceful, stop tear gassing us,’ and we’d run and the tear gas would be on both sides.”

At the intersection at Ontario Street , lines of riot and mounted police refused the demonstrators passage, trapping them between two lines of law enforcement.

About an hour after the initial confrontation, police made an announcement that everyone between police lines was under arrest.

Instead, police handcuffed some detainees for arrest while releasing others in groups of about 50 about every 15 minutes.

Wenstrom, who was one of those detained and was later released, said police tactics were heavy-handed.

“We should be allowed to be downtown protesting if we want,” she said. “We pay taxes on these streets; these are our streets.”

—Jon Collins, Alex Ebert, Jake Grovum and Karlee Weinmann contributed to this report.

Comments

The Minnesota Daily wants to host a forum for discussion regarding issues and stories regarding the University of Minnesota and surrounding communities. However, the online comments should not be used to threaten or defame. This is a place for people to be heard, and want to contribute to discussion. Those who persist to use expletives, inappropriate, racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post.

nader paul kucinich gravel

Veterans
Independents
Real Conservatives

End Neocon GREED
Ron Ralph St Paul United

"America where are you now?
Don't you care about your sons and daughters?
Don't you know we need you now
We can't fight alone against the monster"

gravel kucinich paul nader
mckinney ventura too
perot charts
RATM

Obama's healthcare plan

planted provocateurs?

Please note: a small band of masked "anarchists" smashes windows and police cars, but is not arrested or stopped by the police, who are out in massive numbers. The police then converge with tear gas and rubber bullets on peaceful demonstrators and make mass arrests, justified by the actions of the untouched vandals. This appears to be a strategy of using planted provocateurs.

This was proven to have

This was proven to have occured during 2004 RNC in New York. Videos show undercover cops (known as such from videos of previous crime scenes) instigating violence. One video shows an undercover cop saying, basically, "it's ok, i'm undercover" and being allowed to walk away from a mass arrest that he instigated.

This, of course, doesn't mean that the same thing is happening in Saint Paul. But it also lends credibility to arguments that it may be happening.

New York City is still paying out tens of millions of dollars in settlements over its actions at the 2004 RNC as relates its police force's treatment of citizens in and around protests. But this is all factored into convention costs, it seems.

Of course, if there were no, mass arrests, how could the police and city justify all the new gadgets and all the overtime pay?

Mainstream got those shots.

I don't doubt that some of the hooligans were planted. I thought it was amazing that I did not see more mainstream media on the streets, yet there was a photo in the pioneer press of an anarchist smashing a window. At the same time it is possible that adrenaline and testosterone got the best of some protesters.

Probably not provocateurs

I doubt it. There are some who really want to wreak havoc on the convention. I was at the march last night, and it was peaceful, and we STILL got gassed. They were gassing us as we were running away. The cops are trigger happy with that stuff and Im sure it gives them a huge boner firing those huge cannons of tear gas at protesters. Thank You SPPD!! Glad to see that our tax dollars are going to good use.

Judge need to set bail at $500,000

F**K the little bastards!

Evil?

Oh come on now. Think about it. These kids have no legal recourse. Has anyone even bothered to listen to their message? Or have you just bought into the laughable caricature presented by major media outlets? These kids are trying to move us towards a society based on mutual aid, racial and sexual equality, sustainable development, and cooperation rather than our current arrangement that is based on militarized borders and a centralized government that is no longer meaningfully representational. And no one is getting that message because it's being presented to the public as something sinister.
In a two party system, there's nothing to do but smash windows. Do you really think that any of the candidates intend to change the course of coercive diplomacy, military intervention, corporate unaccountability, and mathematically unsustainable growth that characterizes our society? I think not. If you can't vote for someone who will resist the spread of predatory economic policy and irresponsible, short sighted resource use, then I think it's commendable to smash the windows of the economic institutions that benefit from it. Those places are all insured anyway, so what is everyone complaining about? I think it takes a lot of bravery. And anyway, can anyone provide an example of a meaningful change in the course of human history that didn't take a few broken windows to accomplish?

Ted Kaczynski?

No legal recourse? Is it then my understanding that it is unlawful for these young adults to participate in the democratic process? That's complete and utter nonsense; they have the opportunity to make themselves heard through all kinds of legal and non-disruptive means.

As for the "commendable" act of violating the private property of businesses, would you find it noble if I came down to where you live and work and destroy your possessions? Would you think it was fair and justifiable if someone were to rob from you? I doubt it.

Additionally, for the businesses being insured... are you aware of the fallacy of the broken window? It literally applies in this case; going around smashing windows isn't good for anybody.

You sir are a detestable fool.

No Legal Recourse?

Anyone who terms vandalism "commendable" is indeed a fool.

Lawful recourse

" Lawful participation in the democratic process" was derailed in 2000 when Bush's people, with the aid and collusion of the CEO of Diebold and the Justice Department, had the electronic voting machines programmed to register a Republican victory regardless of the actual count. Gov. Jeb Bush and his loyal party lacky, Katherine Harris, then made sure that evidence to the contrary would not be available.
Finally, the Supreme Court itself, full of Bush, Sr. appointees, took it upon themselves to award the presidency to their preference, depite legions of Constitutional scholars and legal experts testifying to the illegality of such a move, since the Constitution clearly mandates a recount in a close race and makes no mention at all of the Supreme Court having the authority to take such a role.
So, unfortunately, to tell someone that their only choice is to participate in the democratic process is lame, because said process is only a sham under Bush and Cheney. Protest too effectively, and Bush has asserted the right to be able to declare you, at his whim, an enemy combatant who can be whisked off to Guantanamo and held indefinitely with no charges, no access to legal counsel, and no habeas corpus.
You need to wake up. We live in dangerous times. We hover on the brink of fascism. Will you choose to hide, or will you stand and fight for the America that proudly existed before George Bush?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <b> <i> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Are you human?
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.