29°
20°
13°
Mostly Cloudy | Weather provided by KSTP.com
Football

Jekyll and Hyde like offense plagues Gophers


BY Austin Cumblad
PUBLISHED: 11/16/2008

Call it the tale of two offenses; call it the tale of two halves; call it the tale of two somethings, because Saturday, Minnesota’s offense had two entirely different personalities.

One could move the ball down the field and score, seemingly at will; the other could hardly gain a yard and looked eager to give the ball back to Wisconsin.

It was almost like the Gophers’ offense was fighting itself. The two offensive personalities couldn’t co-exist, so the question on every possession became: Which one will take the field this drive?

The answer always came quickly; Minnesota never held the ball for more than three minutes . Unfortunately for the Gophers, the stymied offense showed up a few too many times — especially in the second half — against a Badgers team determined to claw its way back from a 21-7 halftime deficit.

Of course, the fact that Minnesota was sitting on 21 points at the break is a testament to the fact that the offense played its best game in weeks. Thanks to a fumble recovery by junior defensive tackle Garrett Brown deep in Wisconsin territory, the Gophers scored their first touchdown since the second quarter against Northwestern on Nov. 1, just a minute and a half into the second quarter Saturday. Along with the three-play, 11-yard drive returned the offense’s confidence — for awhile at least.

Its next two drives resulted in quick scores, the run game was respectable and at halftime, sophomore quarterback Adam Weber was an ultra-efficient 7-of-9 for 116 yards and a pair of touchdown strikes. He found the end zone with a 6-yard quarterback draw as well.

But such consistent production wasn’t there the whole day, and ultimately, it was the offense’s inconsistent moments that decided the game.

Head coach Tim Brewster certainly realizes it.

“That’s been kind of our deal the last couple of weeks offensively,” he said after the game. “We really haven’t been a consistent football team.”

Or at least not consistent enough. The notion that it’s better to be inconsistent than consistently bad may be generally accurate, but as was the case Saturday with Minnesota’s offense, too much inconsistency can be disastrous.

Consider the fourth quarter. The Gophers took over on their own 7-yard line, minutes after freshman Troy Stoudermire fumbled a kickoff out the back of the end zone for a safety. Three plays and two sacks later, the Badgers had another safety and a four-point lead.

On the very next possession, freshman running back Shady Salamon fumbled the toss from Weber on an option and Wisconsin’s Jonathan Casillas jumped on the ball at Minnesota’s 11-yard line — what happened to the offense that scored three straight touchdowns in the second quarter?

Backed up to their own 11, the Gophers couldn’t do much to keep the Badgers from scoring. That doesn’t mean the defense wasn’t expecting to make a stand. Minnesota’s defenders could have, and probably should have, blamed the offense for coughing up the ball twice inside the 15 — Weber and freshman running back DeLeon Eskridge botched an exchange on the first drive of the game that Wisconsin recovered at the 10 — but they were making no excuses.

“That’s our job,” junior linebacker Simoni Lawrence said of stopping the Badgers when they start a drive from deep in Gophers territory. “We have to keep them from getting a touchdown. We think we should hold them to three.”

No such luck; Wisconsin’s lead was stretched to 11 and proved insurmountable, but not before the offense showed flashes of what it’s capable of one more time. Weber orchestrated an 11-play, 60-yard scoring drive that brought Minnesota to within three with a little over four minutes to play.

It proved too little too late; the inconsistency could not be overcome.

“That’s what we’re working on,” senior defensive end Willie VanDeSteeg said of becoming a more consistent offensive football team. “It’s just going to take time.”

Comments

The Minnesota Daily wants to host a forum for discussion regarding issues and stories regarding the University of Minnesota and surrounding communities. However, the online comments should not be used to threaten or defame. This is a place for people to be heard, and want to contribute to discussion. Those who persist to use expletives, inappropriate, racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <b> <i> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Are you human?
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.